theodore shachtman theodore shachtman

Description of the Atlas Introduction Demo

This post describes the structure of the Atlas introductory session.

1 | Purpose

The session is designed to demonstrate that the Atlas Method can be:

  • Easy to learn – taught in an hour.

  • Fast to use – applied in real time while watching new material.

  • Highly effective – delivers stronger comprehension, retention, and—crucially—better fluid reasoning (finding patterns and analogies) than conventional study tactics.

2 | Materials

  1. Five short (~3-minute) STEM videos on moderately complex topics (e.g., How a 3-D tumbler lock works, The medical-test paradox).

    • One of these five is randomly selected as the non-Atlas control video; the other four will be Atlas videos.

  2. Three cognitively rich everyday concepts the participant already knows (chosen from a preset list such as atomic model, traffic intersection, or how a bow stores and releases energy).

3 | Learning / Encoding Phase

  1. Video 1 (Atlas). The trainer walks the participant through building Atlas icons at key points in the video.

  2. Video 2 (Atlas). The participant repeats the process of pausing and building icons independently or with minimal help.

  3. Video 3 (Control). The participant studies however they like—pausing, note-taking, or re-watching are allowed—but may not use Atlas.

  4. Video 4 (Atlas). The participant returns to viewing with Atlas.

  5. Video 5 (Atlas). Same as step 4.

4 | Evaluation Phase

  1. Control Analogy Task.

    • The participant tries to find patterns and analogies between the three familiar concepts and the control video (the one studied without Atlas).

    • They describe how the task feels—effort level, amount of searching, working-memory load.

  2. Atlas Analogy Task.

    • Using Atlas, they look for patterns and analogies among the four Atlas-encoded videos.

    • Again they report the subjective experience.

  3. Comparative Reflection.

    • They explicitly compare the two tasks, noting differences such as the “snapping” effect, mental workload, and speed of insight.

5 | What the Demo Typically Shows

  • Rapid onboarding: One guided example is enough to let most people use Atlas confidently.

  • Enjoyable Process: Participants typically report enjoying the study process.

  • Superior retention: Atlas-encoded concepts stay clear; control material fades or must be “pulled” with effort.

  • Fluid-reasoning boost: Even though the Atlas videos are newer, participants generally form analogies among them more quickly and effortlessly than between the control video and familiar concepts.

  • Clean causal contrast: Because the control video is randomly chosen and equal in difficulty, the only systematic difference is use vs. non-use of Atlas, isolating the method’s effect.

This concise protocol lets participants feel the dramatic reduction in cognitive load and the spontaneous “snapping” of connections that the Atlas Method enables.

Read More
theodore shachtman theodore shachtman

35 Common Topics to Test the Difficulty of the MSST

It all begins with an idea.

  1. Photosynthesis and Carbon Fixation in Plants
    (Light-dependent and light-independent reactions, chloroplast structure)

  2. Newton’s Laws of Motion and Their Applications
    (Forces, acceleration, friction, inertia, momentum)

  3. The Structure and Function of DNA and the Central Dogma
    (Replication, transcription, translation, protein synthesis)

  4. Ecosystems and Energy Flow
    (Food chains/webs, trophic levels, cycling of matter and energy)

  5. Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure
    (Ionic, covalent, metallic bonds, molecular geometry, polarity)

  6. The Water Cycle and Its Global Impact
    (Evaporation, condensation, precipitation, infiltration, runoff)

  7. Human Circulatory System and Blood Flow
    (Heart structure, arteries, veins, capillaries, oxygen and nutrient transport)

  8. Electromagnetic Spectrum and Light Interactions
    (Wavelength, frequency, absorption, emission, practical uses)

  9. Plate Tectonics and Earth’s Geological Processes
    (Crust, mantle, core, earthquakes, volcanoes, continental drift)

  10. The Nitrogen Cycle and Its Importance for Life
    (Nitrogen fixation, nitrification, denitrification, assimilation)

  11. Supply and Demand in Economic Systems
    (Markets, price equilibrium, elasticity, shifts in curves)

  12. Human Immune System Defense Mechanisms
    (Innate vs. adaptive immunity, antibodies, vaccines, pathogens)

  13. Mendelian Genetics and Inheritance Patterns
    (Dominant/recessive traits, Punnett squares, genotypes/phenotypes)

  14. World War II: Causes, Key Events, and Outcomes
    (Axis/Allied powers, major battles, political and economic impacts)

  15. Acids, Bases, and pH in Chemical Reactions
    (Arrhenius/Brønsted-Lowry theories, neutralization, indicators)

  16. The Human Digestive System and Nutrient Absorption
    (Mechanical/chemical digestion, enzyme function, absorption)

  17. Elections and the Electoral College in the U.S.
    (Popular vs. electoral vote, swing states, voting rights, process)

  18. Cell Cycle and Mitosis/Meiosis
    (Phases, checkpoints, genetic variation, errors)

  19. Evolution by Natural Selection
    (Variation, selection pressures, adaptation, speciation)

  20. The Carbon Cycle and Climate Change
    (Photosynthesis/respiration, fossil fuels, greenhouse gases)

  21. Ohm’s Law and Basic Electrical Circuits
    (Voltage, current, resistance, series and parallel circuits)

  22. The Structure and Function of the Nervous System
    (Neurons, synapses, brain regions, sensory/motor pathways)

  23. Atmospheric Layers and Weather Patterns
    (Troposphere/stratosphere, jet streams, weather systems)

  24. Industrial Revolution: Causes and Societal Changes
    (Technological innovation, urbanization, labor movements)

  25. The Process of Scientific Inquiry and Experimental Design
    (Hypothesis, controls, variables, analysis, replication)

  26. The Bill of Rights and Its Impact on Civil Liberties
    (Key amendments, court interpretations, limits and protections)

  27. Properties of Gases and Gas Laws
    (Boyle’s, Charles’s, Ideal Gas Law, real vs. ideal gases)

  28. The Human Reproductive System and Fertilization
    (Anatomy, gametogenesis, fertilization, pregnancy stages)

  29. Photosynthesis vs. Cellular Respiration: A Comparison
    (Inputs, outputs, energy transfer, role in ecosystems)

  30. World Religions and Their Historical Impacts
    (Core beliefs, spread, influence on culture/politics)

  31. The Judicial System and Supreme Court in the U.S.
    (Structure, role, judicial review, landmark cases)

  32. Biodiversity and Conservation Biology
    (Genetic/species/ecosystem diversity, threats, preservation strategies)

  33. The Periodic Table: Organization and Trends
    (Groups/periods, atomic number, periodicity, reactivity trends)

  34. The Structure and Function of the U.S. Government
    (Including branches, checks and balances, federalism, and how laws are made)

  35. Cellular Respiration and Energy Production
    (Glycolysis, Krebs cycle, electron transport chain, ATP synthesis)

Read More
theodore shachtman theodore shachtman

Materials Used in Ted’s YouTube Demos

It all begins with an idea.

Videos (watched in order)

Bernuli’s Principle (watched at 1.25x speed, extremely minimal pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DW4rItB20h4&t=604s&pp=ygUVYmVybm91bGxpJ3MgcHJpbmNpcGxl

Functionality of Bluetooth (watched at 1.25x speed, extremely minimal pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1I1vxu5qIUM&pp=ygUJYmx1ZXRvb3Ro

Virtual memory (normal speed, 2 minutes of pausing through the 20 minute video)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A9WLYbE0p-I&pp=ygUOdmlydHVhbCBtZW1vcnk%3D

James web space telescope (1.25x speed, no pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=csIry_3pbDU&pp=ygUaamFtZXMgd2ViYiBzcGFjZSB0ZWxlc2NvcGU%3D

Green’s function (3 minutes of pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ism2SfZgFJg&pp=ygUSTWF0aGVtYW5pYWMgZ3JlZW5z0gcJCc0JAYcqIYzv

Understanding buckling (normal speed, no pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=21G7LA2DcGQ&pp=ygUidGhlIGVmZmljaWVudCBlbmdpbmVlciBjb21wcmVzc2lvbg%3D%3D

Evolution of rock paper scissors (normal speed, no pausing)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tCoEYFbDVoI&pp=ygUgZXZvbHV0aW9uIG9mIHJvY2sgcGFwZXIgc2Npc3NvcnM%3D

Long term memory videos:

(First 4, presented in a group)

Matrix factorization

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZspR5PZemcs&pp=ygUrbm9uIG5lZ2F0aXZlIG1hdHJpeCBmYWN0b3JpemF0aW9uIHN0YXRxdWVzdA%3D%3D

Nerf gun

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N8JpePwvuHw&pp=ygUTSmFyZWQgb3dlbiBuZWVmIGd1bg%3D%3D

Transistors

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pqfjer8-O4&t=1030s&pp=ygUcQnJhbmNoIGVkdWNhdGlvbiB0cmFuc2l0b3Jzcw%3D%3D

Wallis product

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8GPy_UMV-08&t=1251s&pp=ygUUV2FsbGlzIHByb2R1Y3QgM2JsdWU%3D

(Next 2, presented 5 minutes after reasoning with the given set)

Next pointers

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U4hFQCa1Cq0&pp=ygUWTmV4dCBwb2ludGVycyBsZWV0Y29kZQ%3D%3D

Heart anatomy

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0anNccSxNY&t=5s&pp=ygUNSGVhcnQgYW5hdG9teQ%3D%3D

(Next 2, presented after a 5 minute reasoning chain)

PNG algorithm 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EFUYNoFRHQI&t=1405s&pp=ygUXUG5nIGFsZ29yb3RobSByZWR1Y2libGU%3D

Besier curves

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aVwxzDHniEw&t=1289s&pp=ygUNQmVzaWVyIGN1cnZlcw%3D%3D

(Last one, presented after 5 minute reasoning chain)

Cortical columns

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dykkubb-Qus&pp=ygUOYXJ0ZW0ga2lyc2Fub3Y%3D



Videos for the 11 item task

Novel Videos

Heart anatomy

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0anNccSxNY&pp=ygUeRWxlY3Ryb3BoeXNpb2xvZ3kgb2YgdGhyIGhlYXJ0

Speculative decoding

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VkWlLSTdHs8

The economic opportunity of climate tech

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FvKeHcpps1Y

A plan is not a strategy

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iuYlGRnC7J8

Lidar workings

https://youtu.be/3EehCU3csJQ?si=4EHzc-PwSkMEUSwA

First 3 concepts from the participants list

Merkle trees

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n6nEPaE7KZ8&t=204s&pp=ygUMbWVya2xlIHRyZWVz0gcJCdgJAYcqIYzv

Reed Solomon codes

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1pQJkt7-R4Q&pp=ygURcmVlZCBzb2xvbW9uIGNvZGU%3D

Tumbler lock

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=smIdInCQ-kU&pp=ygUiamFyZWQgb3dlbiBhbmltYXRpb25zIHR1bWJsZXIgbG9jaw%3D%3D

Next 3 concepts from the participants list

Why is pi in the normal distribution?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cy8r7WSuT1I&pp=ygUkM2JsdWUxYnJvd24gd2h5IHBpIGlzIGluIHRoZSBub3JtYWwg

The hardest problem on the hardest test

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OkmNXy7er84&t=316s&pp=ygUndGhlIGhhcmRlc3QgcHJvYmxlbSBvbiB0aGUgaGFyZGVzdCB0ZXN0

How do keyboards work?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h-NM1xSSzHQ&pp=ygUZYnJhbmNoIGVkdWNhdGlvbiBrZXlib2FyZA%3D%3D



Videos for the 6 item task

The Stimuli: The challenge involved synthesizing 6 complex concepts:

The Task: Immediately after watching the two videos (the neuroscience video at 1.25x speed with a total of 1:30 of pause time; the governments video at regular speed with 2 minutes of pause time), my task was to produce a 10-minute, uninterrupted monologue, finding deep structural connections and analogies among all six concepts.

(Correction Note: During the monologue, I accidentally used the word "autocracy" when I meant to say Oligarchy-- it was a genuine speech error, not a logical one.)

Read More
theodore shachtman theodore shachtman

Breakdown for Ted’s 11 Item YouTube Demo

It all begins with an idea.

https://youtu.be/4ze600SVWO8

Deconstructing the Synthesis: A Descriptive Analysis of the Reasoning

The following is a descriptive analysis of the reasoning chains observed in the 11-system synthesis demonstration. The monologue is broken down into its primary logical steps and thematic components to provide a clear record of the cognitive processes demonstrated. This guide covers the main points, although some much nuance is lost due to the extended length required to outline every reasoning step throughout the entire monologue.

Thematic Block 1: Initial System Categorization and Control Mechanisms

  • Initial Analysis: The reasoning begins by establishing a distinction between two types of systems. The Merkle Tree is identified as a hierarchical system that allows for data compression. This is contrasted with the Climate Change Model, which is described as a large, non-compressible, interacting web of parts. The practitioner then immediately categorizes the Heart system alongside the climate model as another large, interacting system.

  • Second-Level Analogy: A new structural feature, "control mechanisms," is introduced. An analogy is formed between the controls of the Heart (the sympathetic/parasympathetic nervous systems modulating its rate) and the controls of the Lidar system (the rotating polygon and mirrors modulating the laser).

  • Cross-Domain Mapping: The concept of a "delay" in the heart's signal conductance is then abstracted. This abstract principle of "delay leading to cascading effects" is mapped onto the Climate model, specifically referencing how a sudden demand for one material (boron) could create second-order effects and bottlenecks in other industries.

Thematic Block 2: Analysis of Planning, Strategy, and Determinism

  • Central Argument: A significant portion of the monologue is dedicated to a critique of the "A Plan is Not a Strategy" video, using the other concepts in the set as evidence.

  • Categorization for Critique: The practitioner posits that the strategy video's advice (to keep plans short and simple) is only applicable to one class of systems: those that are deterministic and constrained. Examples from the set are categorized this way, including the Tumbler Lock, Lidar, and Reed-Solomon Codes.

  • The Contrast: This class of systems is then contrasted with complex, probabilistic, real-world systems, for which the Climate Tech market is used as the prime example. The reasoning is that in these systems, simple plans are insufficient.

Thematic Block 3: Introduction of Game Theory and Multi-Agent Environments

  • Core Insight: To explain why simple plans fail in complex environments, the concept of a multi-agent system is introduced via an analogy to the game of Survivor.

  • The Argument: The argument is made that in a multi-agent system where everyone is strategizing against everyone else, one's own strategy must be complex enough to account for the actions of others. This refutes the "short plan" idea on game-theoretic grounds.

Thematic Block 4: The "Generator-Verifier" Schema, Resource Constraints, and Nuance

  • The "Verifier" Schema: A new abstract principle is introduced, drawing from the Speculative Decodingvideo's concept of a "generator-verifier" model. This principle distinguishes between systems that have a built-in "verifier" and those that do not.

  • Application: Merkle Trees and Reed-Solomon Codes are identified as systems that are fundamentally verifiable. This is contrasted with Business Strategy, which is identified as probabilistic and lacking a definitive verifier.

  • Resource Constraint Dis-analogy: The practitioner notes that in strategy, one must often commit limited resources to a single, unverified path. This is contrasted with the logic of Reed-Solomon codes, where adding redundant data guarantees a certain outcome. This is also mapped to the Tumbler Lock(you can only test one key at a time).

  • Nuanced Distinction in Error Correction: A further distinction is made between Reed-Solomon Codesand Merkle Trees. The former is identified as a system for correcting errors from random noise, while the latter is a system for defending against malicious actors (tampering). This distinction is then applied back to strategy: is one planning against the randomness of the world, or against the actions of competitors?

Thematic Block 5: The Meta-Strategy of Dimensionality Reduction

(Note: This section of reasoning occurred after the introduction of the final three concepts: The Hardest Problem, Normal Distribution, and Keyboard)

  • Core Meta-Analogy: The monologue identifies a problem-solving process as the core structure for a new set of analogies. The process, taken from "The Hardest Problem" video, is: when a 3D problem is too difficult, find an analogous 2D problem, solve it, and use the insight to solve the original 3D problem.

  • First Application: This 3D-to-2D problem-solving structure is mapped onto the relationship between Lidar (a 3D sensing system) and the Keyboard (a 2D sensing system).

  • Second, Contrasting Application: The same dimensional-shifting principle is then connected to the Normal Distribution video. Here, the practitioner notes that the process is reversed: to solve a difficult 2D problem (the area under the bell curve), the presenter must "bump up" the problem into 3D to make the calculation possible.

Thematic Block 6: The Final Unifying Theory

  • Core Insight: The monologue concludes by tying the "dimensionality" meta-strategy to the Speculative Decoding concept.

  • The Unifying Analogy: The entire strategy of using a simpler model (the 2D case) to gain an insight that helps solve a harder model (the 3D case) is identified as being structurally identical to how speculative decoding works in AI—you use a "dumber," faster model to generate a likely path, which the "smarter," more complex model can then quickly verify. This provides a single, elegant theory that connects abstract mathematics, engineering, problem-solving, and cutting-edge artificial intelligence, all drawn from the provided set of concepts.

Read More
theodore shachtman theodore shachtman

Breakdown for Ted’s 6 Item YouTube Demo

It all begins with an idea.

https://youtu.be/PO6cFQBkZ5g

Demonstration Context & Protocol

The task was a real-time synthesis test designed to showcase the "Mental Atlas" method's ability to integrate novel information with a pre-existing knowledge base. The protocol was as follows:

The Stimuli: The challenge involved synthesizing 6 complex concepts:

The Task: Immediately after watching the two videos (the neuroscience video at 1.25x speed with a total of 1:30 of pause time; the governments video at regular speed with 2 minutes of pause time), my task was to produce a 10-minute, uninterrupted monologue, finding deep structural connections and analogies among all six concepts.

(Correction Note: During the monologue, I accidentally used the word "autocracy" when I meant to say Oligarchy-- it was a genuine speech error, not a logical one.)


Rohan found connections between only the two novel videos, not other concepts stored in his Atlas.

Deconstructing the Synthesis: A Timestamped Guide to the Reasoning

This guide breaks down the monologue from Ted's demonstration video, explaining the key analogies and reasoning chains step-by-step. The goal is to make the rapid, dense connections more accessible and to show how the "Mental Atlas" method is used to navigate and synthesize complex, disparate systems in real time.

[0:07 - 0:55] – Core Idea: Oscillation as Function vs. Bug

  • Analogy: Steam Engine/Vibrohammer ↔ Parliamentary/Democratic Systems

  • Explanation: I start by identifying a deep structural pattern common to multiple systems: oscillation between two states. In the Steam Engine and Vibrohammer, this back-and-forth mechanical oscillation is the core feature that makes the machine work; it's a productive process. I then map this same structure onto governments, where the "oscillation" is the transfer of power between opposing parties. Here, I identify a crucial difference: this same structure often manifests as a bug—a source of instability and inefficiency. This "dis-analogy" allows me to diagnose a fundamental weakness in the political systems by seeing how the same pattern has opposite effects in different contexts.

[0:55 - 1:25] – Core Idea: The Missing "Spring" in Politics

  • Analogy: Vibrohammer's Insulating Spring ↔ Lack of Insulation in Politics

  • Explanation: Building on the previous insight, I analyze why the oscillation is functional in the machine. The Vibrohammer has springs that insulate the chaotic vibration from the main body, allowing the chaos to be safely harnessed. I then turn this back to the political systems and realize they are missing an analogous "spring." There is no mechanism to insulate society from the instability of power transfers. This is an example of using the source domain (the machine) to identify a missing, and much-needed, component in the target domain (politics).

[1:25 - 2:20] – Core Idea: Consensus and System Design

  • Analogy: Cortical Columns ↔ Ideal Government Design

  • Explanation: I shift focus to the goal of these systems. The Cortical Columns in the "Thousand Brains Theory" work to achieve a consensus vote on what they are perceiving. I identify this same goal of achieving a stable, functional state in the Vibrohammer (resonance) and steam engine (a stable cycle). I then posit that an ideal government would also have a mechanism for achieving consensus, a design principle from neuroscience and engineering that could be applied to political science.

[2:20 - 3:30] – Core Idea: Deterministic vs. Complex Systems

  • Analogy: Binary Search ↔ The Design of Governments

  • Explanation: Here, I categorize the systems based on their nature. A Binary Search is a powerful algorithm, but it is fundamentally deterministic—its behavior is perfectly predictable and requires an ordered system. I contrast this with the other systems (governments, engines, brains), which are complex and non-deterministic. This insight highlights that while we can precisely design an algorithm, we cannot "design" a government with the same level of predictable certainty.

[3:30 - 5:05] – Core Idea: The Goal of a "Valid State"

  • Analogy: Vibrohammer/Cortical Column Consensus ↔ The Goal of All Governments (except Oligarchy)

  • Explanation: I refine the "consensus" idea into the more abstract goal of achieving a specific "valid state." I reason that most forms of government, from democracy to totalitarianism, are designed to achieve what it defines as a valid state (e.g., "the will of the people" or "total party control"). I then identify that an Oligarchy is a key exception, as it's often an unstable, emergent consequence of a poorly designed system rather than a system striving for a coherent, stable state. This is a very nuanced piece of reasoning about system goals.

[5:05 - 6:50] – Core Idea: The Brain's Evolution as a Metaphor for Government Evolution

  • Analogy: (Hippocampus → Neocortex) ↔ (Parliamentary System → Federalist System)

  • Explanation: This is a "meta-analogy" about how systems evolve to become more efficient. The neuroscience video explains that the uniform, modular structure of the neocortex evolved from the monolithic hippocampus by taking a core circuit and copying it billions of times. I map this entire evolutionary process onto government: a single parliamentary system is like the hippocampus (monolithic), while a federalist government is like the neocortex (modularizing the core function of governance across many states to create a more robust system).

[6:50 - 8:20] – Core Idea: Eigenvectors as the Unchanging Principles of Systems

  • Analogy: Mathematical Eigenvector ↔ Core Ideology of a Government

  • Explanation: Here I take a highly abstract concept from linear algebra to create a new lens for political science. An eigenvector is a direction that remains unchanged when a transformation is applied. I map this onto a political system, where the "transformation" is the chaos of time and events, and the "eigenvector" is the core, unshakeable ideology that the system seeks to preserve (e.g., a totalitarian state's singular goal of maintaining absolute control).

[8:20 - 9:30] – Core Idea: A Final Synthesis of Feedback Loops

  • Analogy: Feedback Loops across Vibrohammer, Cortical Columns, and Binary Search

  • Explanation: In the final section, I tie several systems together by identifying a fundamental engineering and computational principle—the feedback loop—at work in three completely different domains: mechanical (Vibrohammer adjusting to soil), neurological (Cortical Columns using attention), and algorithmic (Binary Search using a comparison to guide the next step).

Read More